“It’s basically, unfortunately, an exercise in rubber-stamping a project that proponents want to see go through no matter what.”
Published Apr 22, 2025 • Last updated 1 hour ago • 3 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Lorne Scott, president of Nature Saskatchewan, stands for a portrait near Wascana Lake on Thursday, April 17, 2025 in Regina.Photo by KAYLE NEIS /Regina Leader-Post
Article content
While one Saskatchewan environmental group is “pleased” there will be a review on the first phase of the Lake Diefenbaker irrigation project, another doesn’t think it’s enough to truly understand potential risks to the province’s water supply.
Saskatchewan’s Water Security Agency (WSA) plans to submit the Westside Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (WIRP) to the Ministry of Environment for an environmental assessment before moving ahead with construction, it announced last week.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
Nature Saskatchewan president Lorne Scott says he still has concerns about wider impacts of the megaproject.
“To have a proper review would be much preferred than this window dressing,” said Scott. “It’s basically, unfortunately, an exercise in rubber-stamping a project that proponents want to see go through no matter what.”
However, the Saskatchewan Environmental Society (SES) says it’s “pleased” to see WSA engage in this process considering there was uncertainty around whether it would do a Phase 1 environmental review at all.
“Some of the earlier rhetoric on this project made it sound like they might try to avoid doing an assessment and I think a project of its magnitude and consequence requires one,” said Robert Halliday, SES vice-president.
The first phase looks to build out 90,000 acres of irrigable farmland at an estimated cost of $1.15 billion. Once all three phases are complete, the total expansion is envisioned to cover 500,000 acres.
Headline News
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Province anticipating federal involvement
Nature Saskatchewan and SES have both been vocal in their opposition to the Lake Diefenbaker project since it was first announced by the province in 2020.
SES was one of 13 signees on a 2021 petition organized by Nature Saskatchewan that asked the federal environment minister to intervene and mandate a study under the Impact Assessment Act.
Scott says Nature Saskatchewan still wants to see WSA engage in a full-scope assessment that looks at the entirety of the project, especially its impact on the South Saskatchewan River Delta’s wetlands, water flows and water quality.
“It is an interprovincial waterway and it’s not just Saskatchewan. The water comes from Alberta. What’s left ends up in Manitoba and it affects Crown land, which is First Nations land,” Scott said.
Added Halliday: “The feds do have some responsibilities here, certainly for the Indigenous file, fisheries and things like that, and so there’s some ways they could get involved here.”
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The Saskatchewan government has been negotiating a cost-share agreement with Ottawa to support the Lake Diefenbaker project since 2020, but federal officials have not yet committed any funds.
Diefenbaker irrigation expansion
Lauded as the largest public works venture in the province’s history, the three-part Lake Diefenbaker project is intended to double the farmland connected to Saskatchewan’s irrigation network.
Phase 1 aims to modernize existing infrastructure, including 45 kilometres of canals to handle increased water flow, construct a new reservoir and upgrade the Westside pump station.
Shawn Jaques, WSA president and CEO, said the voluntary environmental review is for the sake of “transparency and accountability.”
“This is a generational project and like any large project the province would undertake, we want to make sure that we do it the right way,” said Jaques.
The assessment process is designed to consider potential risks to wildlife, habitat or water quality and include public engagement, including Indigenous communities. It could take between six months and a year, pushing construction to late 2026 or 2027.
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The next two phases — Westside expansion and the Qu’Appelle South project — are expected to expand capacity north towards Asquith and south towards the Moose Jaw-Regina corridor.
A precise timeline for the completion of all three phases has not been announced.
A 2024 economic analysis by consulting firm KMPGestimated the Westside project has a potential $5.9-billion return on investment through gross domestic product growth over 50 years, with 70 per cent — about $4.4 billion — remaining in Saskatchewan.
The Regina Leader-Post has created an Afternoon Headlines newsletter that can be delivered daily to your inbox so you are up to date with the most vital news of the day. Click here to subscribe.
With some online platforms blocking access to the journalism upon which you depend, our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark leaderpost.com and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed. Click here to subscribe.